and another question! 😄 UMH expects all datamodelling to be done in the DFCs/PCs right? any plans to add something highbyte like?

How would you think about this? what are the features you like in highbyte? in general, it is a UNS, so feel free to use any other tool availabel on the market 🙂 in our vision, we will try to make the DFCs and PCs as good as possible and add "stream processors" to it (which will be a sub-type of DFCs with input and output being the UNS, so basically just for data modeling inside of the UNS)

i like their OOP approach make a model, link tags, send them back to the uns in a structured way

so what you mean is that you like: 1. modelling / defining the target namespace first. together with inheritance, etc. 2. then using protocol converters to "fill out" the target namespace something like this?

yes! with some conditions as well i want to do this on a trigger/every X seconds (if tag bigger than value, on a alarm,...)

I second this. I think having a clear semantic hierarchy designed first, and then filling it with data, would make the process much smoother and more intuitive. It would also help ensure consistency and make the UNS easier to navigate for everyone involved.