https://www.umh.app logo
Join Discord
Powered by
Issue: sensorconnect never starts, "partial timeou...
# umh-support
t
Issue: sensorconnect never starts, "partial timeout" during deployment
No weirdness in the action log other than it says the state is initializing repeately until it says "partial timeout" Stuck in initializing....log has one entry 2024-10-25T05:46:02.610252678-04:00 configuration file read error: /benthos.yaml: (2,1) unable to infer input type from candidates: [sensorconnect]
I tried deleting the converter, connection, and recreatinging it. I tried it on my raspberry pi device on docker running umh lite I also tried it on umh classic running in a vm on rocky linux...same result.
j
Did you update the UMH?
t
using upgrade in the console? or something else?
j
Exactly
t
Would the kernel version affect it?
j
No, let us check what happened there and why you are not getting the newest benthos version
Likely we did not release the new UMH version yet, it should be 0.5.34, let us check
we released teh new version now, causing the issue @Diederik 😄 but you should be able to sue it now, sorry for the onconvenience
t
no worries, thanks for the quick response!
j
keep us updated! it might take some time at the beginning for new unknown sensors until the IODD file is downloaded, but once it was downloaded it should be cached
t
I will say, your response time is unmatched...and being able to upgrade quickly is something that would be a challenge in other architectures...
j
these are the parts where you decision to go for IT/OT best practices instead of going for "whatever everyone else is doing" start to shine 🙂 it makes me really happy that you say this 🙂
t
Having new issues...
I upgraded to .34, deleted connections. Tried recreating them in both umh lite, and classic....
action-log-3
j
port 443 is the cause
connect to port 80
t
Is that noted somewhere?
j
no, might make sense to add it somewhere
l
t
This is one of my confusions with having the port in the connection, before you ever select protocol....
Fixed the issue...moving to the next steps...am I getting data?
worked like a charm! Love this! I have not seen an IOLink integration like this yet...even by the vendors of the masters and sensors...
d
very impressive
t
As long as you get the ip and port right....it automatically reads the data to get the sensors, downloads the iodd from the internet, interpets it, and models the payload....magic!
j
feel free to post in the I4.0 discord channel, or to post on linkedin if you really like it 🙂 would be helpful for us as marketing
3 Views
PreviousNext
Powered by